<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: See ya around Vista and dumping Ubuntu 7.04</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/</link>
	<description>All About Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Purchase windows vista Download oem</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-42784</link>
		<dc:creator>Purchase windows vista Download oem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-42784</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Purchase windows vista Download oem&lt;/strong&gt;

yes indeed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Purchase windows vista Download oem</strong></p>
<p>yes indeed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-18672</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-18672</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with your assessment, and thanks so much for posting it - you made me feel better.  I have returned after 6 years of faithful service to Windows 2K; I would purchase XP - would NEVER purchase VISTA - and have now tried 10 distros of Linux.  As someone above said - Puppy seems to be the best of all of them and runs in RAM!  The last (and worst) &quot;experiment&quot; was last week . . . when I found as you did that Ubuntu, Kubunt and unfortunately even Xubuntu (with the very cool xfce desktop, lean and mean!) - were ALL awful in detecting . . . yep . . . USB 2 stuff . . . despite my loading drivers from all over the planet.

The one benefit was I once and for all learned my way around Linux, and sudo, and terminal, and apt-get, and unpacking tarballs verbosely, etc . . . good grief.  I know a few people dislike Mr. Gates, but I heard the angels sing when Windows 2000 (for the third time in a week) loaded back up and I restored my system.  Oh . . . and I tried the &quot;dual boot&quot; thing 8 of the 10 times I&#039;ve tried Linux - and I don&#039;t recmmend that either.  If your MBR isn&#039;t hosed and you do NOT have to fix/reinstall Windows - you&#039;ll find Windows starts up slower and so does Linux.  Pick one or the other for my 2 cents.

Again - sorry you had trouble and if it&#039;s any consolation I was in exactly the same place one week ago today.  When Windows 2k is tweaked (fluff remeoved, a job done on the registry, certain &quot;fixes,&quot; etc) - it runs like a rocket - and hopefully I will be able to use it for some time.  I will purchase XP before it &quot;runs out&quot; in January of 2008, and see where I am then and where Linux is at that time.  Oddly enough, a year ago I was trying an earlier Ubuntu version (hedgehog/dapper?) - and it was fine and recognized everything.  I think the USB2 problem is with 7.04, and for that reason perhaps some other distro (Fedora, perhaps) might be a better choice.

In any event I&#039;m sticking with W2K professional and smiling!  Best regards/ Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with your assessment, and thanks so much for posting it &#8211; you made me feel better.  I have returned after 6 years of faithful service to Windows 2K; I would purchase XP &#8211; would NEVER purchase VISTA &#8211; and have now tried 10 distros of Linux.  As someone above said &#8211; Puppy seems to be the best of all of them and runs in RAM!  The last (and worst) &#8220;experiment&#8221; was last week . . . when I found as you did that Ubuntu, Kubunt and unfortunately even Xubuntu (with the very cool xfce desktop, lean and mean!) &#8211; were ALL awful in detecting . . . yep . . . USB 2 stuff . . . despite my loading drivers from all over the planet.</p>
<p>The one benefit was I once and for all learned my way around Linux, and sudo, and terminal, and apt-get, and unpacking tarballs verbosely, etc . . . good grief.  I know a few people dislike Mr. Gates, but I heard the angels sing when Windows 2000 (for the third time in a week) loaded back up and I restored my system.  Oh . . . and I tried the &#8220;dual boot&#8221; thing 8 of the 10 times I&#8217;ve tried Linux &#8211; and I don&#8217;t recmmend that either.  If your MBR isn&#8217;t hosed and you do NOT have to fix/reinstall Windows &#8211; you&#8217;ll find Windows starts up slower and so does Linux.  Pick one or the other for my 2 cents.</p>
<p>Again &#8211; sorry you had trouble and if it&#8217;s any consolation I was in exactly the same place one week ago today.  When Windows 2k is tweaked (fluff remeoved, a job done on the registry, certain &#8220;fixes,&#8221; etc) &#8211; it runs like a rocket &#8211; and hopefully I will be able to use it for some time.  I will purchase XP before it &#8220;runs out&#8221; in January of 2008, and see where I am then and where Linux is at that time.  Oddly enough, a year ago I was trying an earlier Ubuntu version (hedgehog/dapper?) &#8211; and it was fine and recognized everything.  I think the USB2 problem is with 7.04, and for that reason perhaps some other distro (Fedora, perhaps) might be a better choice.</p>
<p>In any event I&#8217;m sticking with W2K professional and smiling!  Best regards/ Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msandersen</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10918</link>
		<dc:creator>msandersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10918</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s opensource and there&#039;s opensource. There are brilliant projects, like Apache, PHP etc, all technical commandline-stuff they tend to be good at when united under one project with good leadership, and there are tons of mediocre or even bad ones. Building a good OS is a huge task; making it a good Desktop system moreso. FreeBSD etc are examples of good well-thought-out OS projects that is designed for a purpose and does it well. Projects like PC-BSD are interesting, and they have put somethough into converting it into a Desktop system, but the underlying System is still not designed for it. So far, Apple/NeXT is the only one to have put the planning effort and execution into making a proper Desktop system from Unix. It is a measure of their success that both Vista and Linux are examples of attempts to copy their features, no more evident than in Aero and Compiz/Beryl, but also in various other apps and features like indexed Search.
Gnu/Linux&#039;s original goal was to make a free implementation of Unix, and that it does well overall. But the attempt to bolt on features to make it a Desktop system is half-hearted and a hodgepodge, frankly, because you have a myriad of subprojects who don&#039;t communicate or coordinate with each other that are thrown together in Distributions to make one whole. Bolting on a Desktop Environment on a commandline-system doesn&#039;t make an ideal Desktop system. Deep system-level changes need to be made for that, and no-one is attempting to do that. With FreeBSD you at least only have one system, not a hundred Distros that need its own software repository in a variety of formats.
It&#039;s a pity GTK sucks so badly, though, I quite like Gnome as a DE. QT is far better, but is proprietary and I don&#039;t care for KDE.

As a side note, I will get to test out Vista on Monday when my new computer arrives. I do have reservations of Vista compatibility and hardware requirements, but having to settle for a now-outdated system like XP with huge security issues doesn&#039;t seem right. I may dual-boot with Ubuntu like my current PC. From reading and experience, I&#039;ve determined a Debian-based distro with Gnome is best, so PCLinuxOS, SuSe and Fedora are out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s opensource and there&#8217;s opensource. There are brilliant projects, like Apache, PHP etc, all technical commandline-stuff they tend to be good at when united under one project with good leadership, and there are tons of mediocre or even bad ones. Building a good OS is a huge task; making it a good Desktop system moreso. FreeBSD etc are examples of good well-thought-out OS projects that is designed for a purpose and does it well. Projects like PC-BSD are interesting, and they have put somethough into converting it into a Desktop system, but the underlying System is still not designed for it. So far, Apple/NeXT is the only one to have put the planning effort and execution into making a proper Desktop system from Unix. It is a measure of their success that both Vista and Linux are examples of attempts to copy their features, no more evident than in Aero and Compiz/Beryl, but also in various other apps and features like indexed Search.<br />
Gnu/Linux&#8217;s original goal was to make a free implementation of Unix, and that it does well overall. But the attempt to bolt on features to make it a Desktop system is half-hearted and a hodgepodge, frankly, because you have a myriad of subprojects who don&#8217;t communicate or coordinate with each other that are thrown together in Distributions to make one whole. Bolting on a Desktop Environment on a commandline-system doesn&#8217;t make an ideal Desktop system. Deep system-level changes need to be made for that, and no-one is attempting to do that. With FreeBSD you at least only have one system, not a hundred Distros that need its own software repository in a variety of formats.<br />
It&#8217;s a pity GTK sucks so badly, though, I quite like Gnome as a DE. QT is far better, but is proprietary and I don&#8217;t care for KDE.</p>
<p>As a side note, I will get to test out Vista on Monday when my new computer arrives. I do have reservations of Vista compatibility and hardware requirements, but having to settle for a now-outdated system like XP with huge security issues doesn&#8217;t seem right. I may dual-boot with Ubuntu like my current PC. From reading and experience, I&#8217;ve determined a Debian-based distro with Gnome is best, so PCLinuxOS, SuSe and Fedora are out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Losers</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10812</link>
		<dc:creator>Losers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10812</guid>
		<description>I have to admit linux sucks ass.  They need to stop forking a new distro after every minor change.  Linux is a perfect case study of why open source does not work.  Free software foundation, get a job!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit linux sucks ass.  They need to stop forking a new distro after every minor change.  Linux is a perfect case study of why open source does not work.  Free software foundation, get a job!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy hendrix</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10392</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10392</guid>
		<description>man, your whining sucks, too!
out of so many linux distros, you just couldn&#039;t try one more...
i can advise you try more, as i am running Ubuntu Dapper on a Dell Inspiron laptop, and Fedora Core 6 on a desktop, both without any problems whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man, your whining sucks, too!<br />
out of so many linux distros, you just couldn&#8217;t try one more&#8230;<br />
i can advise you try more, as i am running Ubuntu Dapper on a Dell Inspiron laptop, and Fedora Core 6 on a desktop, both without any problems whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10182</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10182</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s unfortunate that Ubuntu 7.04 didn&#039;t work for you, as my experience has been so far that this is a great system. But I guess I got lucky in that my laptop&#039;s hardware is supported. I think that Linux (any distro), if developers want it to go mainstream, needs to find a way to address the fact that there is an ENORMOUS amount of hardware out there. It seems that one of two things needs to happen.

Either:

1 - Make sure that at the very least ESSENTIAL hardware works (networking, keyboard/mouse, at least basic graphics). Then as soon as the system boots it should connect to their servers to download the needed drivers/modules. And certainly USB should work flawlessly -- that one still baffles me. 

and/or:

2 - Work with an OEM to sell preconfigured systems so that all these problems are worked out before the consumer uses it. 

I still think Linux (whatever flavor you settle on) is worth a try, and even worth the effort that it takes to configure a working system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s unfortunate that Ubuntu 7.04 didn&#8217;t work for you, as my experience has been so far that this is a great system. But I guess I got lucky in that my laptop&#8217;s hardware is supported. I think that Linux (any distro), if developers want it to go mainstream, needs to find a way to address the fact that there is an ENORMOUS amount of hardware out there. It seems that one of two things needs to happen.</p>
<p>Either:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; Make sure that at the very least ESSENTIAL hardware works (networking, keyboard/mouse, at least basic graphics). Then as soon as the system boots it should connect to their servers to download the needed drivers/modules. And certainly USB should work flawlessly &#8212; that one still baffles me. </p>
<p>and/or:</p>
<p>2 &#8211; Work with an OEM to sell preconfigured systems so that all these problems are worked out before the consumer uses it. </p>
<p>I still think Linux (whatever flavor you settle on) is worth a try, and even worth the effort that it takes to configure a working system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10099</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-10099</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Ubuntu 7.04 is too flaky. Hopefully next LTS will be as good (and of course better) than Dapper which is nice OS.
I vote Fedora 7 though. Extremely good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Ubuntu 7.04 is too flaky. Hopefully next LTS will be as good (and of course better) than Dapper which is nice OS.<br />
I vote Fedora 7 though. Extremely good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aitch</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-9896</link>
		<dc:creator>Aitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-9896</guid>
		<description>Try Puppylinux
see my post
http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/15673#comment-5059</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try Puppylinux<br />
see my post<br />
<a href="http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/15673#comment-5059" rel="nofollow">http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/15673#comment-5059</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Magua</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-9886</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Magua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-9886</guid>
		<description>I guess OEMs putting &quot;Windows Vista Capable&quot; stickers on hardware is just a hoax heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess OEMs putting &#8220;Windows Vista Capable&#8221; stickers on hardware is just a hoax heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ngs</title>
		<link>http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-9878</link>
		<dc:creator>Ngs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjdohnert.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/see-ya-around-vista-and-dumping-ubuntu-704/#comment-9878</guid>
		<description>Yes, try and find PCLOS to download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, try and find PCLOS to download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
