jump to navigation

My journey into Ubuntu and the state of desktop Linux August 21, 2006

Posted by rjdohnert in Opinions, Reviews.
trackback

With LinuxWorld just passed, and lacking the excitement of PDC, I decided to give Ubuntu a tryout considering it recently had a sign on the highways of California and how everyones touting it as the best and the brightest star in the Linux universe. Well after two days of trying, I finally got it installed. Wireless networking was giving me a fit. So I installed it on my trusty experimental laptop, IBM Thinkpad A20m with a Linksys G wireless card. I had to disable the card even though it was natively supported by Linux because of the driver, apparantly in Ubuntu 6.06 its bad so I used NDISWrapper to get the card running. Overall its performed rather well and I do like the plethora of packages in Synaptic. GNOME is so much slower than KDE and you can tell as PC-BSD has run on this laptop and was much faster. Since Ubuntu is one distribution that takes the “Everything should be free and proprietary software sucks”you basically have to go get the drivers and software that make it really usable such as win 32 codecs, MP3 playback, DVD Playback, Java, CrossOver office, Real Player 10, nvidia drivers etc. I may move over to Kubuntu just basically to get rid of the Medieval looking interface of GNOME, although it does have some cool apps, like Rythmbox, F-Spot, Beagle (when it works) and Gnomebaker.

Now is Linux ready for the desktop? Its usable as a desktop, nothing more, nothing less. Its got a good application base, and with some familiars like Picassa and Google Earth making its way there the base is picking up. But its still for techies ultimately. What that means is I wouldnt suggest it to a non-technical user as with Linux its still stuck in the early 90’s. Configuring things like Wireless and Webcams and it entails you know a lot about the system, and not everyone cares about computers that much, while the desktop may be modern the approach is archaic. Remember having to edit you Autoexec.bat and Config.sys files to get your hardware working in Windows 3.1, well its like that in Linux except the files are spread out and located in every part of the system and not in the root directory. The Linux community still needs to work on creating tools that will make hardware and software configuration as effortless as on a Mac or Windows. They need to stop with the proprietary software is illegal angle, its not illegal and if you want the help of software developers and big software development houses you need to drop the bullying and the RMS, bullshit rhetoric. Its not working, its not helping and ultimately you will find its simply counter-productive and for god sakes guys, STANDARDIZE ON ONE PACKAGE FORMAT!!!!! PLEASE!!!!! Its not rocket science and it makes it easier if everyones ducks were in a row. As for users, stick with Vista if you dont know much about computers and/or the Mac. For the average user Windows or the Mac remain the best choice.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. News Feed - August 21, 2006

My journey into Ubuntu and the state of desktop Linux…

Located here , have a read. No flames please and some positive discussion….

2. A Conservative Techie » Blog Archive » Good post on Ubuntu - August 21, 2006

[…] One of the frequent posters to Channel9 has written an excellent post on the current state of Linux on the Desktop. However, I have never had any of the same problems w/ wireless cards since Warty that he has.  I wonder if I have just been lucky or things aren’t as bad as this author makes them out to be.  I do agree that it seems Linux on the Desktop is currently at the state of Windows 95 was.  Less and less config files to edit by hand and more and more you can use a GUI to make the changes in.  Ubuntu and Kubuntu have made great strides to make configuration simple and easy. […]

3. Juan Ceballos - August 22, 2006

I think you need to think about what you have been used to while using Windows, and pick what you really need from there. A great site to understand the non-tech reasons to go for Linux: http://www.getgnulinux.org

4. Lockergnome's Linux Fanatics - August 23, 2006

My journey into Ubuntu and the state of desktop Linux

I enjoyed the piece below a great deal. But the one thing that I found myself agreeing with a great deal – standardizing a package format….

5. Ed Day - August 23, 2006

Ubuntu (Kbuntu) are distros for the techie class. For distro that just “work” and aren’t ashamed of using proprietary codecs and drivers, there are offerings such as Freespire with CNR. It costs more than $0.00 dollars, but so does Windows and Mac recommended by the author.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: