jump to navigation

Why Richard Stallman and the FSF bore me. December 20, 2007

Posted by rjdohnert in Opinions.
trackback

While many see me as attacking Richards pride and joy and as hating free software and the FSF I dont.  I disagree with his views and his conclusion on why Linux needs to be called GNU/Linux and I think he goes overboard, I dont hate the guy.  I look at software as a tool.  I use the tools that work best for me.  Sometimes that tool may be an open source solution, sometimes its a proprietary solution and sometimes its a proprietary solution and open source solution in a mixed environment.  I disagree that binary blobs are bad.  I buy a piece of hardware I want it to work.  If it doesnt work I find a solution that does work.  We have to respect proprietary software/hardware vendors rights.  If they dont want to open source their drivers or software products but are willing to provide the blobs and  support why not use em?

Richards stance is everything needs to be free, well sorry.  In the real world we live in it doesnt work that way.  You have to have give and take, you have to reach a healthy compromise.  Some people blame the lack of interest as the main failing point for Hurd and gNewSense.  Its not, the failures of these systems rest solely on Richard and the FSF.  By not having that give and take the systems failed.  Richard failed.  Both systems, on my hardware anyway, failed miserably. By not having that compromise the FSF will become obsolete.  While the rest of the world is moving on and different Linux and BSD distributors are working together with hardware manufacturers and software vendors to get their hardware and software certified with these distributors the FSF and their systems are becoming more obsolete everyday.

I work with IT vendors and technology companies on an everyday basis.  I have a good relationship with them, I have a good rapport with my vendors.  If I have a piece of hardware or a software packages that fail, I dont sit there and say ” I need to see the source” I say “Look, Im having a problem with this, how can I help you expedite a fix?  Bug reports, system logs etc etc.”  Working with hardware manufacturers and software vendors is a lot like marriage.  In marriage you need to have compromise, you need to have communication otherwise your marriage and relationship are doomed to failure.  In a marriage if you go through demanding ridiculing and (running to the press and writing flame articles) complaining, what happens?  Your spouse, girlfriend, boyfriend, whatever is not going to want your company and will avoid you like the plague.  The same with your relationship with hardware and software vendors. if you spend every meeting complaining, demanding and running to the press writing flame articles you are not being a partner.  You are being a nuisance and will be hard pressed to find anyone willing to work with you.   I know several good IT workers who are out of work because they fancy themselves as being all important and posterboys of some movement.

When Eben Moglen says that Microsoft needs to be afraid, to me he is just wasting air.  Because I dont fear the FSF, Richard Stallman or even the numerous Linux zealots in the world.  I pay attention to people like Sun, Oracle, BEA, Apple, Microsoft, Red Hat, Novell, Intel.  The people that develop tools and solutions that will help me do my job.  The FSF provides me with nothing nor do I pay them to provide me with anything.  So when Richard posts to a mailing list I read or goes to a forum and starts blathering on why should I care what he writes?

So why do Richard Stallman and the FSF bore me? They sure as hell arent my partners, they dont provide me with anything, I dont give them anything.  They dont even help with any kind  of kernel development.  So why should I or anyone else in the industry pay attention to anything they have to say?

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Why Richard Stallman and the FSF bore me - Noticias externas - December 20, 2007

[…] and or ladies here.  Does the FSF and Richard Stallman deserve as much attention as they get.Link" While many see me as attacking Richards pride and joy and as hating free software and the FSF […]

2. Erik - December 20, 2007

Theo de Raadt/OpenBSD doesn’t like closed source or binary blobs either. Why not bash them?

3. kurt - December 20, 2007

Linux bores me.
All zealots, apple, linux, etc bore me.
People who spell microsoft with a $ are boring.
Tenured college professors with no concept of the real world bore me.
People who write about boring people bore me.
People who comment on blog entries about boring people are boring 🙂

But, I agree 100%. When all games for xbox, ps3, etc, etc, then he may be on to something, but until then, RS is just a bore.

4. Roberto J. Dohnert - December 20, 2007

Even though Theo doesnt like binary blobs, but he doesnt go out of his way to try and make hardware vendors “do his bidding”. Theo IMO is a more practical person and doesnt go on crusades claiming binary blobs to be “illegal” like Stallman and his crew does. Im not bashing Stallman, Im just saying his opinions and that of the FSF do not matter to IT workers. My employers dont tell me “Consult with Richard and find out if this is OK”, they dont say ” Find something open source and open source only”, my employers do tell me ” Find the tool that works the best and implement it”

5. Erik - December 20, 2007

Well ok. Maybe he is “a bit” fanatic but he believes open source 110% and wants spread the word. Just like Ballmer believes MS direction and spread FUD about Linux. If someone doesn’t like RS/Ballmer he would just ignore him.
AMD/ATI are opening up their drivers [1], Sun is make Niagara 2 open source [2], etc. Open source on open source OS is a bless.

[1] http://www.fooishbar.org/blog/tech/x/amdspecs-2007-09-12-16-36.html
[2] http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2230189,00.asp

6. kunduz - December 20, 2007

you said “I look at software as a tool. I use the tools that work best for me” ..more power to you ..he looks at software and knowledge and he believes knowledge should be freely(as in freedom of speech) available and publicly shareable

FSF is a political movements ..you seem to care about practical aspects of the movement without the ideas of the movements ..

ideas need to be presented in their most basic and pure form ..in practice, a lot of other considerations taken into account that may transform the idea into something that cant be reasonably formulated and a lot of corruption for practical purposes are taken into account ..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: